How the circumcision solution in Africa will increase HIV infections

Main Article Content

Robert S. Van Howe (1*), Michelle R. Storms (2)

1 Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, United States.
2 Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, United States.
(*) Corresponding Author:
Robert S. Van Howe
vanhowe@miuplink.net

Abstract

The World Health Organization and UNAIDS have supported circumcision as a preventive for HIV infections in regions with high rates of heterosexually transmitted HIV; however, the circumcision solution has several fundamental flaws that undermine its potential for success. This article explores, in detail, the data on which this recommendation is based, the difficulty in translating results from high risk adults in a research setting to the general public, the impact of risk compensation, and how circumcision compares to existing alternatives. Based on our analysis it is concluded that the circumcision solution is a wasteful distraction that takes resources away from more effective, less expensive, less invasive alternatives. By diverting attention away from more effective interventions, circumcision programs will likely increase the number of HIV infections.

Downloads month by month

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Van Howe, R., & Storms, M. (2011). How the circumcision solution in Africa will increase HIV infections. Journal of Public Health in Africa, 2(1), e4. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2011.e4
Author Biographies

Robert S. Van Howe, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine

Clinical Professor

Department of Pediatrics and Human Development

Michigan State University College of Human Medicine

Michelle R. Storms, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine

Assistant Professor

Department of Family Medicine

Michigan State University College of Human Medicine