The feasibility and acceptability of clean fuel use among rural households. A pilot study in Central Ghana

Authors

  • Theresa Tawiah Kintampo Health Research Centre, Research and Development Division, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo North Municipality
  • Seidu Iddrisu Kintampo Health Research Centre, Research and Development Division, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo North Municipality
  • Stephanie Gyaase Kintampo Health Research Centre, Research and Development Division, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo North Municipality
  • Mieks Twumasi Kintampo Health Research Centre, Research and Development Division, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo North Municipality
  • Kwaku Poku Asante Kintampo Health Research Centre, Research and Development Division, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo North Municipality
  • Darby Jack Columbia University, NY, New York

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2022.2205

Keywords:

household energy, clean cookstove, feasibility and acceptability

Abstract

Background: 76% of the population in Ghana uses solid fuels as their primary source of cooking energy, including 41.3% firewood and 31.5% charcoal. Consequently, household air pollution (HAP) continues to be the leading risk factor for the majority of illness burden in the country. In the past, aggressive LPG distribution and adoption schemes have been implemented to reduce HAP in Ghana. Nevertheless, just 22% of Ghanaian households utilize LPG for cooking.
Aims. The purpose of this study was to determine the viability and acceptability of four clean fuels among rural households in central Ghana, both separately and in combination.
Methods: Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to conduct this study. The Kintampo Health Demographic Surveillance System was used to randomly pick ten homes who exclusively utilized biomass fuel. For each family (n = 10), we gave four stove and fuel combinations that were both clean. The stoves were utilized for two weeks, and free fuel was supplied. After each two-week trial period, interviews were conducted to gauge stove acceptance, with an emphasis on finding the specific energy requirements that each stove satisfied.
Conclusions. LPG and ethanol stoves were the most popular among rural families, according to our data. In comparison to Mimi Moto and electric induction stoves, the two stoves were favoured because they were easier to use and clean, cooked faster, were deemed safer, and enabled a variety of cooking styles. Participants’ stove preferences appear to be primarily influenced by two domains: 1) realizing the benefits of clean stove technology and 2) overcoming early anxiety of clean stove use, particularly LPG.

Download data is not yet available.

References

IEA. World Energy Outlook 2019 エ. World Energy Outlook Sereies [Internet]. 2019; Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2019%0Ahttps://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2019%0Ahttps://webstore.iea.org/download/summary/2467?fileName=Japanese-Summary-WEO2019.pdf

Hystad P, Duong M, Brauer M, Larkin A, Arku R, Kurmi OP, et al. Health effects of household solid fuel use: Findings from 11 countries within the prospective urban and rural epidemiology study. Environ Health Perspect. 2019;127(5):1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP3915

Cao L, Zhao Z, Ji C, Xia Y. Association between solid fuel use and cognitive impairment: A cross-sectional and follow-up study in a middle-aged and older Chinese population. Environ Int [Internet]. 2021;146:106251. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106251 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106251

Forouzanfar MH, Afshin A, Alexander LT, Biryukov S, Brauer M, Cercy K, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1659–724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31679-8

WHO. Burning Opportunity : Burning Opportunity : Clean Househ Energy [Internet]. 2016;1–113. Available from: https://www.afro.who.int/sites/default/files/2017-06/9789241565233_eng.pdf

Lacey F, Henze D. Global climate impacts of country-level primary carbonaceous aerosol from solid-fuel cookstove emissions. Environ Res Lett. 2015;10(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/114003

UNEP FA. The State of the World’s Forests 2020. Forests, biodiversity and people. Turning Point in Timber Construction. 2020. 12–15 p.

Nazif-Muñoz JI, Spengler JD, Arku RE, Oulhote Y. Solid fuel use and early child development disparities in Ghana: analyses by gender and urbanicity. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol [Internet]. 2020;30(4):698–706. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-0224-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-0224-4

Weber E, Adu-Bonsaffoh K, Vermeulen R, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Grobbee DE, Browne JL, et al. Household fuel use and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a Ghanaian cohort study. Reprod Health. 2020;17(1):1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-0878-3

WHO. Opportunities for transition to clean household energy: application of the Household Energy Assessment Rapid Tool (HEART) in Ghana [Internet]. 2018. 76 p. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/311280/9789241514491-eng.pdf

Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. GBD Profile; Ghana. Africa Dev Bank. 2010;2010(Gbd):1269–76.

Asante KP, Afari-Asiedu S, Abdulai MA, Dalaba MA, Carrión D, Dickinson KL, et al. Ghana’s rural liquefied petroleum gas program scale up: A case study. Energy Sustain Dev [Internet]. 2018;46:94–102. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.06.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.06.010

Martha Ali Abdulai, Samuel Afari-Aseidu DC et al. Experiences with the Mass Distribution of LPG Stoves in Rural Communities of Ghana. 2018;15(4):757–67.

Agbokey F, Dwommoh R, Tawiah T, Ae-Ngibise KA, Mujtaba MN, Carrion D, et al. Determining the enablers and barriers for the adoption of clean cookstoves in the middle belt of Ghana—A qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071207

Dickinson KL, Piedrahita R, Coffey ER, Kanyomse E, Alirigia R, Molnar T, et al. Adoption of improved biomass stoves and stove/fuel stacking in the REACCTING intervention study in Northern Ghana. Energy Policy [Internet]. 2019;130(April 2018):361–74. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.007

Bawakyillenuo S, Crentsil AO, Innocent K, Danquah S, Boakye- EB. The landscape of energy for cooking in Ghana : A review. Mod Energy Cook Serv. 2021;(June):1–56.

Shankar A V., Quinn AK, Dickinson KL, Williams KN, Masera O, Charron D, et al. Everybody stacks: Lessons from household energy case studies to inform design principles for clean energy transitions. Energy Policy [Internet]. 2020;141(April):111468. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111468

Masera OR, Saatkamp BD, Kammen DM. From linear fuel switching to multiple cooking strategies: A critique and alternative to the energy ladder model. World Dev. 2000;28(12):2083–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00076-0

Jack DW, Asante KP, Wylie BJ, Chillrud SN, Whyatt RM, Ae-Ngibise KA, et al. Ghana randomized air pollution and health study (GRAPHS): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16(1):1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0930-8

Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform [Internet]. 2009;42(2):377–81. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010

Ghana Statistical Service et al. 2021. Title: Ghana 2021 Population and Housing Census. Preliminary report. 2021.

Williams KN, Kephart JL, Fandiño-Del-Rio M, Condori L, Koehler K, Moulton LH, et al. Beyond cost: Exploring fuel choices and the socio-cultural dynamics of liquefied petroleum gas stove adoption in Peru. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2020;66(August). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101591

Gould CF, Schlesinger SB, Molina E, Lorena Bejarano M, Valarezo A, Jack DW. Long-standing LPG subsidies, cooking fuel stacking, and personal exposure to air pollution in rural and peri-urban Ecuador. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol [Internet]. 2020;30(4):707–20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-0231-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-0231-5

Gould CF, Schlesinger S, Toasa AO, Thurber M, Waters WF, Graham JP, et al. Government policy, clean fuel access, and persistent fuel stacking in Ecuador. Energy Sustain Dev [Internet]. 2018;46:111–22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.05.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.05.009

Downloads

Published

12-09-2022

How to Cite

Tawiah, T., Iddrisu, S., Gyaase, S., Twumasi, M., Asante, K. P., & Jack, D. (2022). The feasibility and acceptability of clean fuel use among rural households. A pilot study in Central Ghana. Journal of Public Health in Africa, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2022.2205

Issue

Section

Original Articles