“Our bodies are not strong anymore”: a focus group study on health risk perceptions of ambient air pollution near a petrochemical industry

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2023.2522

Keywords:

ambient air pollution, focus group, health risk perception, petrochemical industry, qualitative study

Abstract

Background. Ambient air pollution has persisted in lessendowed communities, resulting in exposure to unhealthy pollutants. Epidemiological studies on air pollution have been mainly quantitative, with a dearth of information on community health risk perception, a key component of risk management. Objectives. The aim of this focus group study was to highlight the health risk perception of ambient air pollution among people residing near a petrochemical industry and to determine their perceptions of the existing control measures and ideas for more effective control. Methods. Participants were purposefully selected based on age, sex, long-term residence near a petroleum refinery, and occupation. Three 90-minute face-to-face focus groups and one individual interview were conducted. The moderator guided discussions using a pre-formed topic guide. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed manually, and coded using NVivo software. The data analysis was conducted using reflexive thematic analysis. Results. Six themes were generated: negative perception of the environment; the refinery is to blame; air pollution is seen or smelled; air pollution is associated with health and non-health risks; poor response to air pollution- everyone is to blame and the government is primarily responsible for healthy air quality. The participants were not aware of the extent of air pollution’s health risks. Suggestions for air pollution control included regulating gas flaring, environmental health education, and incentives for community members. Conclusion. Participants perceived that their ambient air was unhealthy. However, concerns about the health risks were shaped by contextual factors. The key barriers to effective mitigation were poor environmental health literacy and political factors.

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organisation. Ambient (outdoor)air pollution. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health. Published 2018. Accessed December 11th,

World Health Organisation. Preventing noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) by reducing environmental risk factors. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2017.

Helme DS, Suzanne R, Helme NG, Levinson M, Wooley D. Advancing environmental justice: A new state regulatory framework to abate community-level air pollution hotspots and improve health outcomes. 2017.

Olowoporoku AO, Longhurst JWS, Barnes JH, Edokpayi CA. Towards a new framework for air quality management in Nigeria. Air Pollution XIX; 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2495/AIR110011

Brook RD, Rajagopalan S, Pope CA, 3rd, et al. Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease: An update to the scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121(21):2331-2378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181dbece1

Xu X, Nie S, Ding H, Hou FF. Environmental pollution and kidney diseases. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14(5):313-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2018.11

World Health Organisation. Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution-REVIHAAP Project. 2013.

Briggs D. Environmental pollution and the global burden of disease. British Medical Bulletin. 2003;68:1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldg019

Curtis SE. Ecological Landscapes: populations, air, water and ground. In: Health and Inequality. London: SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2004:151-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209243.n7

Okoye OC, Carnegie E, Mora L. Air pollution and chronic kidney disease risk in oil and gas-situated communities: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Public Health. 2022;67:1604522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2022.1604522

Noel C, Vanroelen C, Gadeyne S. Qualitative research about public health risk perceptions on ambient air pollution. A review study. SSM Popul Health. 2021;15:100879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100879

Nyumba TO, Wilson K, Derrick CJ, Mukherjee N. The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2018;9(1):20-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860

Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis : a practical guide. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3470-2

OECD. Environment at a Glance: OECD Environmental Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2006.

Bladen WA, Karan PP. Perception of air pollution in a developing country. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association. 1976;26(2):139-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1976.10470235

Peng M, Zhang H, Evans RD, Zhong X, Yang K. Actual Air Pollution, Environmental Transparency, and the Perception of Air Pollution in China. The Journal of Environment & Development. 2019;28(1):78-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496518821713

Muindi K, Egondi T, Kimani-Murage E, Rocklov J, Ng N. "We are used to this": a qualitative assessment of the perceptions of and attitudes towards air pollution amongst slum residents in Nairobi. BMC public health. 2014;14:226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-226

Saksena S. Public Perceptions of Urban Air Pollution Risks. Risk, hazards & crisis in public policy. 2011;2(1):1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-4079.1075

Published

30-05-2023

How to Cite

Okoye, O., Carnegie, E., & Mora, L. (2023). “Our bodies are not strong anymore”: a focus group study on health risk perceptions of ambient air pollution near a petrochemical industry. Journal of Public Health in Africa, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2023.2522

Issue

Section

Original Articles